The Executorial Nature of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates as Equivalent to Final and Binding Court Decisions

Authors

  • Ahmad Badawi University of 17 Agustus 1945 Banyuwangi, Indonesia
  • Nikmatul Keumala Nofa Yuwono University of 17 Agustus 1945 Banyuwangi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v5i3.365

Keywords:

Executorial, Fiduciary, Court Decision

Abstract

In the fiduciary guarantee certificate, the phrase “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty” is included, which grants it the same executorial power as a court decision with permanent legal force, as regulated in Article 15 of Law Number 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantees. This study examines three main problems: first, the function of the principles of publicity and speciality in fiduciary guarantee registration; second, the legal force of the fiduciary guarantee certificate; and third, its position as the basis for execution of fiduciary guarantee objects. The research adopts a doctrinal method aimed at systematically explaining legal rules, analyzing interrelations among them, clarifying obscure aspects, and predicting future developments. The approach combines statutory, conceptual, and historical perspectives, employing both primary and secondary legal materials, alongside non-legal references, analyzed through a deductive-qualitative method. The principle of publicity functions to ensure accessibility in identifying fiduciary objects, while the principle of speciality provides legal certainty to fiduciary recipients. However, the fiduciary guarantee certificate is issued by the Ministry of Law, which does not possess the authority to grant executorial power. Therefore, from a theoretical standpoint, the fiduciary guarantee certificate should not equate to a court decision with permanent legal force but rather serve merely as proof of registration containing the statement “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty.” This reveals a normative contradiction between statutory regulation and the practical interpretation of the certificate’s legal force”.

References

Book

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum Legal Theory dan Teory Peradilan Judicialprudence. Makassar: Kencana, 2007.

Bruggink, J.J.H. Refleksi Tentang Hukum. Alih bahasa Arief Sidharta. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Fuady, Munir. Jaminan Fidusia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Khoidin, M. Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan. Surabaya: Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, 2003.

Marzuki, P. M, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana Pranada Media Group, Jakarta. 2008.

_____________Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Rasjidi, Lili. Filsafat Hukum Mazhab dan Refleksinya. Bandung: Remaja Roesdakarya Offset, 1994.

Satrio, J. Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, dan A’an Efendi. Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Harahap, Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Witanto, D, Y, 2015, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Aspek Perikatan, Pendafaran, dan Eksekusi), Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Journal

Defiana Putriyanti, Erma. “Legal Status of Credit Bank Guarantee in Indonesia’s Legal Guarantee.” Sriwijaya Law Review 1, no. 2 (2017).

Fristia Maulana, Ayang, et al. “Legal Analysis of Fiduciary Guarantees in Finance Companies.” Rawang Rencang 5, no. 4 (2024).

Hirwansyah, and Jesse Heber Ambuwaru. “Legal Protection of Creditors Related to Violation of Vehicle Unilateral Fiduciary Collateral Based on the Principle of Justice.” JWS 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i1.197.

Khoidin, M. 2004. Ekssitensi Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Majalah Ilmiah, Perpustakaan Universitas Jember, Jember.

Poesoko, H, Prinsip Pengawasan dan Pembinaan Mejelis Pengawas Daerah merupakan Antisipasi Kriminalisasi terhadap Notaris, Seminar Nasional Ikatan Mahasiswa Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember, Jember, 22 Oktober 2017.

Priadinata, Aiko, et al. “Implementation of the Execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee Object After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18 PPU XVII 2019.” Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics 4, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i2.14431.

Redanti, Maya, et al. “Legal Protection of Creditors of Fiduciary Guarantee Holders for the Transfer of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects by Debtors.” IJIERM 6, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v6i2.339.

Sadewa, Rawikara Dhita, et al. “Legal Protection of Recipients of Fiduciary Guarantees for Supply Goods with Delivery Orders as Proof of Ownership of Collateral Goods.” Journal of Master of Law, [lengkapi volume, nomor, dan tahun].

Suharnoko. “Legal Issues on Pledge Share Agreement.” Indonesia Law Review 1 (2013).

Sulani, et al. “Implementation of Copyright as an Object of Fiduciary Collateral in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.55908/sdg.

Tutik Hidayati, et al. “Praktik Utang Piutang melalui Aplikasi Peer to Peer Lending Kredit Pintar dalam Perspektif Fatwa DSN-MUI.” Rectenstudent Journal 3, no. 3 (2022): 332.

Utami, Putri Dwi, et al. “Legal Uncertainty in Fiduciary Guarantee Law: An Analysis of Reality and Its Impact on Creditors.” Diponegoro Private Law Review 8, no. 1 (2021). https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr.

Yudhoyono, Gatot Eko, and Unggul Basoeky. “The Existence of Law Number 42 Of 1999 on The Execution of Object on Fiduciary Guarantees on Defaulted Debtors.” Equity of Law and Governance 7, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.55637/elg.7.1.11596.89-95.

Yunita, Afdela, et al. “Pawn Execution to PT Pegadaian against Collateral Object Which Does Not Belong to the Pawner.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 3 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.872.

Internet

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3735063/tanpa-sertifikat-fidusia-debt-collector-tak-boleh-eksekusi-di-jalan

http://tribratanews.polri.go.id/?p=389837

http://kbbi.co.id/arti-kata/eksekusi

https://kbbi.web.id/fungsi

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5b714ce8044bf/mahkamah-agung-dukung-ruu-hukum-acara-perdata-segera-disahkan

http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/files/RUU/2005/RUUAcaraPerdata.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Badawi, A., & Yuwono, N. K. N. (2024). The Executorial Nature of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates as Equivalent to Final and Binding Court Decisions. Rechtenstudent, 5(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v5i3.365